8.1.1 Getting started
It is not too hard to define functions in both directions between Ξ©(π1) and β€. By specializing \autorefthm:looptothe to π πππ:π»πΊππΎ=π»πΊππΎ, we have a function π πππβ:β€β(π»πΊππΎ=π»πΊππΎ) defined (loosely speaking) by
π πππn={π πππ\centerdotπ πππ\centerdotβ―\centerdotπ πππβnif n>0,π πππ-1\centerdotπ πππ-1\centerdotβ―\centerdotπ πππ-1β-nif n<0,ππΎπΏπ π»πΊππΎif n=0. |
Defining a function g:Ξ©(π1)ββ€ in the other direction is a bit trickier.
Note that the successor function πππΌπΌ:β€ββ€ is an equivalence,
and hence induces a path ππΊ(πππΌπΌ):β€=β€ in the universe π°.
Thus, the recursion principle of π1 induces a map c:π1βπ° by c(π»πΊππΎ):β‘β€ and πΊπc(π
πππ):=.
Then we have , and we can define .
With these definitions, we can even prove that for any , using the induction principle \autorefthm:sign-induction for .
(We will prove something more general a little later on.)
However, the other equality is significantly harder.
The obvious thing to try is path induction, but path induction does not apply to loops such as that have both endpoints fixed!
A new idea is required, one which can be explained both in terms of classical homotopy theory and in terms of type theory
.
We begin with the former.
Title | 8.1.1 Getting started |
---|---|
\metatable |