<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="15" id="11171">
 <title>orthogonal morphisms</title>
 <name>OrthogonalMorphisms</name>
 <created>2008-10-14 20:41:03</created>
 <modified>2008-10-16 16:33:02</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
 <creator id="3771" name="CWoo"/>
 <author id="3771" name="CWoo"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="18A32"/>
 </classification>
 <defines>
	<concept>orthogonal</concept>
 </defines>
 <synonyms>
	<synonym concept="orthogonal morphisms" alias="diagonally polar pair"/>
 </synonyms>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb,amscd}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
\usepackage{xypic}
\usepackage{pst-plot}

% define commands here
\newcommand*{\abs}[1]{\left\lvert #1\right\rvert}
\newtheorem{prop}{Proposition}
\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{ex}{Example}
\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\pdiff}[2]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}}
\newcommand{\mpdiff}[3]{\frac{\partial^#1 #2}{\partial #3^#1}}</preamble>
 <content>A morphism $f:A\to B$ in a category $\mathcal{C}$ is said to be \emph{orthogonal} to a morphism $g:C\to D$ in $\mathcal{C}$, written $$f\perp g$$ if whenever we have a commutative diagram
$$\xymatrix@+=3pc{A \ar[r]^f \ar[d] &amp; B \ar[d] \\ C \ar[r]_g &amp; D}$$
there is a unique morphism $h:B\to C$ such that the diagram 
$$\xymatrix@+=3pc{A \ar[r]^f \ar[d] &amp; B \ar[d] \ar@{.&gt;}[dl]|h \\ C \ar[r]_g &amp; D}$$
is commutative also.  If $f\perp g$, we sometimes call the ordered pair $(f,g)$ a \emph{diagonally polar pair}.

For example, in \textbf{Set}, the category of sets, any surjective function is orthogonal to an injective function.  To see this, suppose $f:A\to B$ is surjective and $g:C\to D$ injective, with $y\circ f= g\circ x$, where $x:A\to C$ and $y:B\to D$ are functions.  For any $b\in B$, there is some $a\in A$ such that $f(a)=b$ since $f$ is surjective.  Define $h:B\to C$ by $h(b)=x(a)$.  Now, if there is $c\in A$ such that $b=f(a)=f(c)$, then $g(x(a))= y(f(a))=y(b)=y(f(c))=g(x(c))$.  Since $g$ is injective, $x(a)=x(c)$.  This shows that $h$ is a well-defined function.  It is clear that $h\circ f=x$ and $g\circ h=y$.  Now, if $e:B\to C$ is another such a function, then $g(e(b))=y(b)=g(h(b))$, so that $e(b)=h(b)$ since $g$ is injective.  This shows that $h$ is uniquely defined.

Here are some basic properties of the orthogonality relation on morphisms:

\begin{itemize}
\item
If either $f$ or $g$ is an isomorphism, then $f\perp g$.
\item 
If $f\perp f$, then $f$ is an isomorphism.
\item 
If $f\perp g$ and $f\perp h$, then $f\perp (h\circ g)$.  Similarly, $g\perp f$ and $h\perp f$ imply $(h\circ g)\perp f$.  Of course, both statements make sense provided that $h\circ g$ exists.
\end{itemize}

More generally, if $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ are two classes of morphisms in a category $\mathcal{C}$, we say that $\mathcal{F}$ is \emph{orthogonal} to $\mathcal{G}$, or that $(\mathcal{F},\mathcal{G})$ is a \emph{diagonally polar pair}, written $\mathcal{F}\perp \mathcal{G}$, if $f\perp g$ for every $f$ in $\mathcal{F}$ and every $g$ in $\mathcal{G}$.

For every class $\mathcal{X}$ of morphism, the largest class of morphisms in $\mathcal{C}$ such that $\mathcal{X}$ is orthogonal to is denoted by $\mathcal{X}_*$, and the largest class of morphisms that is orthogonal to $\mathcal{X}$ is denoted by $\mathcal{X}^*$.  

Based on the properties of $\perp$ above, below are some properties of $^*$ and $_*$:

\begin{itemize}
\item $\mathcal{X} \subseteq \mathcal{Y}_*$ iff $\mathcal{Y}\subseteq \mathcal{X}^*$.  Equivalently, if $\mathscr{M}$ is the class of all subclasses of morphisms of $\mathcal{C}$, then $(-^*,-_*)$ is a Galois connection between $(\mathscr{M},\subseteq)$ and $(\mathscr{M},\supseteq)$.
\item A morphism is in both $\mathcal{X}^*$ and $\mathcal{X}_*$ iff it is an isomorphism.
\item Both $\mathcal{X}^*$ and $\mathcal{X}_*$ are closed under $\circ$.
\item Given that $m=m_1\circ m_2$ exists in $\mathcal{C}$ and $m_2\in \mathcal{X}_*$, then $m \in \mathcal{X}_*$ iff $m_1\in \mathcal{X}_*$.
\item
If $f\in \mathcal{X}_*$, then the pullback of $f$ along any morphism is again in $\mathcal{X}_*$.
\end{itemize} 

\begin{thebibliography}{9}
\bibitem{fb} F. Borceux \emph{Basic Category Theory, Handbook of Categorical Algebra I}, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)
\end{thebibliography}</content>
</record>
