<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="5" id="1764">
 <title>chromatic number</title>
 <name>ChromaticNumber</name>
 <created>2002-02-03 15:25:43</created>
 <modified>2004-04-13 11:41:07</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
 <creator id="2727" name="mathcam"/>
 <author id="2727" name="mathcam"/>
 <author id="22" name="vampyr"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="05C15"/>
 </classification>
 <related>
	<object name="ChromaticNumberAndGirth"/>
	<object name="FourColorConjecture"/>
	<object name="ChromaticPolynomial"/>
	<object name="ChromaticNumberOfASpace"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{xypic}
\usepackage{color}</preamble>
 <content>The \emph{chromatic number} of a graph is the minimum number of colours required to colour it.

Consider the following graph:

$$\xymatrix{
{\color{red}A} \ar@{-}[r] &amp; {\color{blue}B} \ar@{-}[r] \ar@{-}[d] &amp; {\color{red}C} \ar@{-}[r] \ar@{-}[dl] &amp; {\color{green}F} \ar@{-}[dl] \\
&amp; {\color{green}D} \ar@{-}[r] &amp; {\color{blue}E} &amp; }$$

This graph has been coloured using $3$ colours.  Furthermore, it's clear that it cannot be coloured with fewer than $3$ colours, as well: it contains a subgraph ($BCD$) that is isomorphic to the complete graph of $3$ vertices.  As a result, the chromatic number of this graph is indeed $3$.

This example was easy to solve by inspection.  In general, however, finding the chromatic number of a large graph (and, similarly, an optimal colouring) is a very difficult (NP-hard) problem.</content>
</record>
