<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="11" id="337">
 <title>principle of finite induction proven from the well-ordering principle for natural numbers</title>
 <name>PrincipleOfFiniteInductionProvenFromWellOrderingPrinciple</name>
 <created>2001-10-18 15:38:43</created>
 <modified>2007-06-21 21:09:43</modified>
 <type>Proof</type>
<parent id="245">principle of finite induction</parent>
 <selfproof>0</selfproof>
 <creator id="9137" name="smw"/>
 <author id="9137" name="smw"/>
 <author id="5" name="KimJ"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="03E25"/>
 </classification>
 <keywords>
	<term>number theory</term>
 </keywords>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{xypic}</preamble>
 <content>\PMlinkescapeword{range}
We give a proof for the ``strong" formulation.

Let $S$ be a set of natural numbers such that $n$ belongs to $S$ whenever all numbers less than $n$ belong to $S$ (i.e., assume $\forall n(\forall m&lt;n\ m\in S)\Rightarrow n\in S$, where the quantifiers range over all natural numbers). For indirect proof, suppose that $S$ is not the set of natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$. That is, the complement $\mathbb{N}\setminus S$ is nonempty.  The well-ordering principle for natural numbers says that $\mathbb{N}\setminus S$ has a smallest element; call it $a$. By assumption, the statement $(\forall m&lt;a\ m\in S)\Rightarrow a\in S$ holds. Equivalently, the contrapositive statement $a\in \mathbb{N}\setminus S \Rightarrow \exists m&lt;a\ m\in \mathbb{N}\setminus S$ holds. This gives a contradition since the element $a$ is an element of $\mathbb{N}\setminus S$ and is, moreover, the \emph{smallest} element of $\mathbb{N}\setminus S$.</content>
</record>
