<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="6" id="3396">
 <title>Archimedean property</title>
 <name>ArchimedeanProperty</name>
 <created>2002-08-29 23:10:55</created>
 <modified>2007-01-15 05:11:46</modified>
 <type>Theorem</type>
 <creator id="40" name="Daume"/>
 <author id="40" name="Daume"/>
 <author id="2760" name="yark"/>
 <author id="22" name="vampyr"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="12D99"/>
 </classification>
 <synonyms>
	<synonym concept="Archimedean property" alias="axiom of Archimedes"/>
	<synonym concept="Archimedean property" alias="Archimedean principle"/>
 </synonyms>
 <related>
	<object name="ArchimedeanSemigroup"/>
	<object name="ExistenceOfSquareRootsOfNonNegativeRealNumbers"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amsthm}

\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}</preamble>
 <content>\theoremstyle{definition}

Let $x$ be any real number.  Then there exists a natural number $n$ such that $n &gt; x$.

This theorem is known as the \emph{Archimedean property} of real numbers.  It is also sometimes called the axiom of Archimedes, although this name is doubly deceptive: it is neither an axiom (it is rather a consequence of the least upper bound property) nor attributed to Archimedes (in fact, Archimedes credits it to Eudoxus).

\begin{proof}
Let $x$ be a real number, and let $S = \{ a \in \mathbb{N} : a \leq x \}$.  If $S$ is empty, let $n = 1$; note that $x &lt; n$ (otherwise $1 \in S$).

Assume $S$ is nonempty.  Since $S$ has an upper bound, $S$ must have a least upper bound; call it $b$.  Now consider $b - 1$.  Since $b$ is the least upper bound, $b - 1$ cannot be an upper bound of $S$; therefore, there exists some $y \in S$ such that $y &gt; b - 1$.  Let $n = y + 1$; then $n &gt; b$.  But $y$ is a natural, so $n$ must also be a natural.  Since $n &gt; b$, we know $n \not\in S$; since $n \not\in S$, we know $n &gt; x$.  Thus we have a natural greater than $x$.
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary}
If $x$ and $y$ are real numbers with $x &gt; 0$, there exists a natural $n$ such that $nx &gt; y$.
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
Since $x$ and $y$ are reals, and $x \neq 0$, $y/x$ is a real.  By the Archimedean property, we can choose an $n \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $n &gt; y/x$.  Then $nx &gt; y$.
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary}
If $w$ is a real number greater than $0$, there exists a natural $n$ such that $0 &lt; 1/n &lt; w$.
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
Using Corollary 1, choose $n \in \mathbb{N}$ satisfying $nw &gt; 1$.  Then $0 &lt; 1/n &lt; w$.
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary}
If $x$ and $y$ are real numbers with $x &lt; y$, there exists a rational number $a$ such that $x &lt; a &lt; y$.
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
First examine the case where $0 \leq x$.  Using Corollary 2, find a natural $n$ satisfying $0 &lt; 1/n &lt; (y-x)$.  Let $S = \{ m \in \mathbb{N} : m/n \geq y \}$.  By Corollary 1 $S$ is non-empty, so let $m_0$ be the least element of $S$ and let $a = (m_0-1)/n$.  Then $a&lt; y$.  Furthermore, since $y \leq m_0/n$, we have $y - 1/n &lt; a$; and $x &lt; y - 1/n &lt; a$.  Thus $a$ satisfies $x &lt; a &lt; y$.

Now examine the case where $x &lt; 0 &lt; y$.  Take $a = 0$.

Finally consider the case where $x &lt; y \leq 0$.  Using the first case, let $b$ be a rational satisfying $-y &lt; b &lt; -x$.  Then let $a = -b$.
\end{proof}</content>
</record>
