<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="7" id="3480">
 <title>matrix condition number</title>
 <name>MatrixConditionNumber</name>
 <created>2002-09-28 13:12:02</created>
 <modified>2006-10-07 12:27:04</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
 <creator id="10074" name="stevecheng"/>
 <author id="10074" name="stevecheng"/>
 <author id="2" name="akrowne"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="65F35"/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="15A12"/>
 </classification>
 <defines>
	<concept>ill-conditioned</concept>
	<concept>well-conditioned</concept>
 </defines>
 <synonyms>
	<synonym concept="matrix condition number" alias="matrix condition number"/>
	<synonym concept="matrix condition number" alias="condition number"/>
 </synonyms>
 <related>
	<object name="PropertyOfMatrixConditionNumber"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

%\usepackage{psfrag}
%\usepackage{graphicx}
%\usepackage{xypic}

\providecommand{\norm}[1]{\lVert#1\rVert}</preamble>
 <content>\section{Matrix Condition Number}

The \emph{condition number for matrix inversion} with respect to a matrix norm
$\norm{\cdot}$ of a square matrix $A$ is defined by
\[
\kappa(A) = \Vert A \Vert \Vert A^{-1} \Vert\,,
\]
if $A$ is non-singular; and $\kappa(A) = +\infty$ if $A$ is singular.

The condition number is a measure of stability or sensitivity of a matrix (or the linear system it represents) to numerical operations. In other words, we may not be able to trust the results of computations on an ill-conditioned matrix.

Matrices with condition numbers near 1 are said to be \emph{well-conditioned}.  Matrices with condition numbers much greater than one (such as around $10^5$ for  a $5 \times 5$ Hilbert matrix) are said to be \emph{ill-conditioned}.  

If $\kappa(A)$ is the condition number of $A$, then $\kappa(A)$ measures 
a sort of inverse distance from $A$ to the set of singular matrices,
normalized by $\norm{A}$.
Precisely, if $A$ is invertible, and $\norm{B - A} &lt; \norm{A^{-1}}^{-1}$,
then $B$ must also be invertible.  On the other hand, in the case of the $2$-norm,
there always exists a singular matrix $B$ such that $\norm{B-A}_2 = \norm{A^{-1}}_2^{-1}$
(so the distance estimate is sharp).

\begin{thebibliography}{3}
\bibitem{Golub} Golub and Van Loan. \emph{Matrix Computations}, 3rd edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
\end{thebibliography}</content>
</record>
