<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="13" id="371">
 <title>ideal</title>
 <name>Ideal</name>
 <created>2001-10-19 01:28:08</created>
 <modified>2007-12-29 23:48:54</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
 <creator id="24" name="djao"/>
 <author id="24" name="djao"/>
 <author id="4430" name="archibal"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="13A15"/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="11N80"/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="16D25"/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="14K99"/>
 </classification>
 <defines>
	<concept>left ideal</concept>
	<concept>right ideal</concept>
	<concept>2-sided ideal</concept>
	<concept>two-sided ideal</concept>
 </defines>
 <related>
	<object name="Subring"/>
	<object name="PrimeIdeal"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{xypic}</preamble>
 <content>\PMlinkescapeword{term}
Let $R$ be a ring. A \emph{left ideal} (resp., \emph{right ideal}) $I$ of $R$ is a nonempty subset $I \subset R$ such that:
\begin{itemize}
\item $a-b \in I$ for all $a,b \in I$
\item $r \cdot a \in I$ (resp. $a \cdot r \in I$) for all $a \in I$ and $r \in R$
\end{itemize}
A \emph{two-sided ideal} is a left ideal $I$ which is also a right ideal. If $R$ is a commutative ring, then these three notions of ideal are equivalent. Usually, the word ``ideal'' by itself means two-sided ideal.

The name ``ideal'' comes from the study of number theory.  When the failure of unique factorization in number fields was first noticed, one of the solutions was to work with so-called ``ideal numbers'' in which unique factorization did hold.  These ``ideal numbers'' were in fact ideals, and in Dedekind domains, unique factorization of ideals does indeed hold.  The term ``ideal number'' is no longer used; the term ``ideal'' has replaced and generalized it.</content>
</record>
