<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="23" id="4050">
 <title>separation axioms</title>
 <name>SeparationAxioms</name>
 <created>2003-02-23 14:57:19</created>
 <modified>2007-05-27 00:42:56</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
 <creator id="127" name="Koro"/>
 <author id="127" name="Koro"/>
 <author id="3" name="drini"/>
 <author id="1858" name="matte"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="54D10"/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="54D15"/>
 </classification>
 <defines>
	<concept>Hausdorff</concept>
	<concept>completely Hausdorff</concept>
	<concept>normal</concept>
	<concept>completely normal</concept>
	<concept>regular</concept>
	<concept>Tychonoff</concept>
	<concept>completely regular</concept>
	<concept>perfectly normal</concept>
	<concept>Tychonov</concept>
	<concept>perfectly $T_4$</concept>
 </defines>
 <synonyms>
	<synonym concept="separation axioms" alias="separation properties"/>
 </synonyms>
 <related>
	<object name="NormalTopologicalSpace"/>
	<object name="HausdorffSpaceNotCompletelyHausdorff"/>
	<object name="SierpinskiSpace"/>
	<object name="MetricSpacesAreHausdorff"/>
	<object name="ZeroDimensional"/>
	<object name="T2Space"/>
	<object name="RegularSpace"/>
	<object name="T4Space"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>% this is the default PlanetMath preamble.  as your knowledge
% of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but
% it should be fine as is for beginners.

% almost certainly you want these
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
%\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
%\usepackage{xypic}

% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them

% define commands here
\renewcommand{\text}{\textnormal}
\newcommand{\C}{\mathbb{C}}
\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\N}{\mathbb{N}}
\newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}}</preamble>
 <content>\PMlinkescapeword{name} \PMlinkescapeword{names} 
\PMlinkescapeword{type} \PMlinkescapeword{types} 
\PMlinkescapeword{order} \PMlinkescapeword{axiom}

The \emph{separation axioms} are additional conditions which may be required to a topological space in order to ensure that some particular types of sets can be
separated by open sets, thus avoiding certain pathological cases.

\begin{center}
\begin{tabular*}{.8\textwidth}{lp{0.65\textwidth}}
\textbf{Axiom}                          &amp; \textbf{Definition} \\
\hline
$T_0$ &amp; given two distinct points, there is an open set containing exactly one of them; \\
\PMlinkname{$T_1$}{T1Space} &amp; given two distinct points, there is a neighborhood of each of them which does not contain the other point;\\
\PMlinkname{$T_2$}{T2Space} &amp; given two distinct points, there are two disjoint open sets each of which contains one of the points;\\
$T_{2\frac{1}{2}}$ &amp; given two distinct points, there are two open sets, each of which contains one of the points, whose closures are disjoint;\\
\PMlinkname{$T_3$}{T3Space} &amp; given a closed set $A$ and a point $x\notin A$, there are two disjoint open sets $U$ and $V$ such that $x\in U$ and $A\subset V$;\\
$T_{3\frac{1}{2}}$ &amp; given a closed set $A$ and a point $x\notin A$, there is an Urysohn function for $A$ and $\{b\}$;\\
$T_4$ &amp; given two disjoint closed sets $A$ and $B$, there are two disjoint open sets $U$ and $V$ such that $A\subset U$ and $B\subset V$;\\
$T_5$ &amp; given two separated sets $A$ and $B$, there are two disjoint open sets $U$ and $V$ such that $A\subset U$ and $B\subset V$.\\
\end{tabular*}
\end{center}

If a topological space satisfies a $T_i$ axiom, it is called a $T_i$-space.
The following table shows other common names for topological spaces with these or other additional separation properties.
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
\textbf{Name}                         &amp; \textbf{Separation properties} \\
\hline
Kolmogorov space                      &amp; $T_0$ \\
Fr\'echet space                         &amp; $T_1$ \\
Hausdorff space                       &amp; $T_2$ \\
Completely Hausdorff space            &amp; $T_{2\frac{1}{2}}$\\
Regular space                         &amp; $T_3$ and $T_0$\\
Tychonoff or completely regular space &amp; $T_{3\frac{1}{2}}$ and $T_0$\\
Normal space                          &amp; $T_4$ and $T_1$\\
Perfectly $T_4$ space                 &amp; $T_4$ and every closed set is a $G_\delta$ (see \PMlinkname{here}{G_deltaSet}) \\
Perfectly normal space                &amp; $T_1$ and perfectly $T_4$\\
Completely normal space               &amp; $T_5$ and $T_1$\\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

The following implications hold strictly:
\begin{align*}
    (T_2 \text{ and } T_3) &amp;\Rightarrow T_{2\frac{1}{2}}\\
    (T_3 \text{ and } T_4) &amp;\Rightarrow T_{3\frac{1}{2}}\\
    T_{3\frac{1}{2}}       &amp;\Rightarrow T_3\\
    T_5                    &amp;\Rightarrow T_4
\end{align*}

\begin{align*}
\text{Completely normal } &amp;\Rightarrow \text{ normal }\Rightarrow
\text{ completely regular }\\
&amp;\Rightarrow \text{ regular }\Rightarrow T_{2\frac{1}{2}}\Rightarrow T_2\Rightarrow T_1 \Rightarrow T_0
\end{align*}

\textbf{Remark.} Some authors define $T_3$ spaces in the way we defined regular spaces, and $T_4$ spaces in the way we defined normal spaces (and vice-versa); there is no consensus on this issue.
\medskip

\textbf{Bibliography:} \emph{Counterexamples in Topology}, L. A. Steen, J. A. Seebach Jr., Dover Publications Inc. (New York)</content>
</record>
