<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="8" id="4350">
 <title>Behrend's construction</title>
 <name>BehrendsConstruction</name>
 <created>2003-06-12 01:19:13</created>
 <modified>2006-06-14 23:12:02</modified>
 <type>Result</type>
<parent id="3839">Szemer\'edi's theorem</parent>
 <creator id="348" name="bbukh"/>
 <author id="348" name="bbukh"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="11B25"/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="05D10"/>
 </classification>
 <keywords>
	<term>arithmetic progressions</term>
 </keywords>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
%\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
%\usepackage{xypic}

\makeatletter
\@ifundefined{bibname}{}{\renewcommand{\bibname}{References}}
\makeatother</preamble>
 <content>\PMlinkescapeword{size}
\PMlinkescapeword{order}

At first sight it may seem that the greedy algorithm yields the densest subset of $\{0,1,\dotsc,N\}$ that is free of arithmetic progressions of length $3$. It is not hard to show that the greedy algorithm yields the set of numbers that lack digit $2$ in their \PMlinkname{ternary development}{Base3}. \PMlinkname{Density}{AsymptoticDensity} of such numbers is $O(N^{\log_3 2-1})$.

However, in 1946 Behrend\cite{cite:behrend_szem_low} constructed much denser subsets that are free of arithmetic progressions. His major idea is that if we were looking for a progression-free sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$, then we could use spheres. So, consider an $d$-dimensional cube $[1,n]^d \cap \mathbb{Z}^d$ and family of spheres $x_1^2+x_2^2+\dotsb+x_d^2=t$ for $t=1, \dotsc, d n^2$. Each point in the cube is contained in one of the spheres, and so at least one of the spheres contains $n^d/d n^2$ lattice points. Let us call this set $A$. Since sphere does not contain arithmetic progressions, $A$ does not contain any progressions either. Now let $f$ be a Freiman isomorphism from $A$ to a subset of $\mathbb{Z}$ defined as follows. If $x=\{x_1,x_2,\dotsc,x_d\}$ is a point of $A$, then $f(x)=x_1+x_2(2n)+x_3(2n)^2+\dotsb+x_d(2n)^{d-1}$, that is, we treat $x_i$ as $i$'th digit of $f(x)$ in base $2n$. It is not hard to see that $f$ is indeed a Freiman isomorphism of order $2$, and that $f(A) \subset \{1, 2,\dotsc,N=(2n)^d\}$. If we set $d=c\sqrt{\ln N}$, then we get that there is a progression-free subset of $\{1,2,\dotsc,N\}$ of size at least
$N e^{-\sqrt{\ln N}(c\ln 2+2/c+o(1)}$. To maximize this value we can set $c=\sqrt{2/\ln 2}$. Thus, there exists a progression-free set of size at least
\begin{equation*}
N e^{-\sqrt{8\ln 2 \ln N}(1+o(1))}.
\end{equation*}

This result was later generalized to sets not containing arithmetic progressions of length $k$ by Rankin\cite{cite:rankin_behrgen}. His construction is more complicated, and depends on the estimates of the number of representations of an integer as a sum of many squares. He proves that the size of a set free of $k$-term arithmetic progression is at least
\begin{equation*}
N e^{-c (\log N)^{1/(k-1)}}.
\end{equation*}

On the other hand, Moser\cite{cite:moser_behrendbound} gave a
construction analogous to that of Behrend, but which was explicit
since it did not use the pigeonhole principle.

\begin{thebibliography}{1}

\bibitem{cite:behrend_szem_low}
Felix~A. Behrend.
\newblock On the sets of integers which contain no three in arithmetic
  progression.
\newblock {\em Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.}, 23:331--332, 1946.
\newblock \PMlinkexternal{Zbl 0060.10302}{http://www.emis.de/cgi-bin/zmen/ZMATH/en/quick.html?type=html&amp;an=0060.10302}.

\bibitem{cite:moser_behrendbound}
Leo Moser.
\newblock On non-averaging sets of integers.
\newblock {\em Canadian J. Math.}, 5:245--252, 1953.
\newblock \PMlinkexternal{Zbl
  0050.04001}{http://www.emis.de/cgi-bin/zmen/ZMATH/en/quick.html?type=html&amp;an%
=0050.04001}.

\bibitem{cite:rankin_behrgen}
Robert~A. Rankin.
\newblock Sets of integers containing not more than a given number of terms in
  arithmetical progression.
\newblock {\em Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A}, 65:332--344, 1962.
\newblock \PMlinkexternal{Zbl 0104.03705}{http://www.emis.de/cgi-bin/zmen/ZMATH/en/quick.html?type=html&amp;an=0104.03705}.

\end{thebibliography}

%@ARTICLE{cite:behrend_szem_low,
% author    = {Felix A. Behrend},
% title     = {On the sets of integers which contain no three in arithmetic %progression},
% journal   = {Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.},
% volume    = 23,
% year      = 1946,
% pages     = {331--332}
%}</content>
</record>
