<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="4" id="444">
 <title>ordering relation</title>
 <name>OrderingRelation</name>
 <created>2001-10-21 01:54:10</created>
 <modified>2004-03-20 23:01:06</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
 <creator id="24" name="djao"/>
 <author id="24" name="djao"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="03-00"/>
 </classification>
 <defines>
	<concept>opposite ordering</concept>
 </defines>
 <related>
	<object name="TotalOrder"/>
	<object name="PartialOrder"/>
	<object name="Relation"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{xypic}</preamble>
 <content>Let $S$ be a set. An {\em ordering relation} is a relation $\leq$ on $S$ such that, for every $a,b,c \in S$:
\begin{itemize}
\item Either $a \leq b$, or $b \leq a$,
\item If $a \leq b$ and $b \leq c$, then $a \leq c$,
\item If $a \leq b$ and $b \leq a$, then $a = b$.
\end{itemize}

Equivalently, an ordering relation is a relation $\leq$ on $S$ which makes the pair $(S,\leq)$ into a totally ordered set. {\bf Warning:} In some cases, an author may use the term ``ordering relation'' to mean a partial order instead of a total order.

Given an ordering relation $\leq$, one can define a relation $&lt;$ by: $a &lt; b$ if $a \leq b$ and $a \neq b$. The {\em opposite ordering} is the relation $\geq$ given by: $a \geq b$ if $b \leq a$, and the relation $&gt;$ is defined analogously.</content>
</record>
