<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="12" id="4493">
 <title>distributivity</title>
 <name>Distributive</name>
 <created>2003-07-22 13:10:59</created>
 <modified>2007-06-29 04:04:39</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
 <creator id="2760" name="yark"/>
 <author id="2760" name="yark"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="06D99"/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="13-00"/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="16-00"/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="17-00"/>
 </classification>
 <defines>
	<concept>distributive</concept>
	<concept>left distributive</concept>
	<concept>right distributive</concept>
	<concept>left-distributive</concept>
	<concept>right-distributive</concept>
	<concept>distributes over</concept>
	<concept>left distributivity</concept>
	<concept>right distributivity</concept>
	<concept>left distributes over</concept>
	<concept>left distributive law</concept>
	<concept>right distributive law</concept>
 </defines>
 <synonyms>
	<synonym concept="distributivity" alias="distributive law"/>
	<synonym concept="distributivity" alias="distributive property"/>
 </synonyms>
 <related>
	<object name="Ring"/>
	<object name="DistributiveLattice"/>
	<object name="NearRing"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}</preamble>
 <content>Given a \PMlinkname{set}{Set} $S$ with two binary operations $+\colon S \times S \to S$ and $\cdot\colon S \times S \to S$, we say that $\cdot$ is {\em right distributive} over $+$ if
$$(a+b) \cdot c = (a \cdot c) + (b \cdot c)\mathrm{~for~all~} a,b,c \in S$$
and {\em left distributive} over $+$ if
$$a \cdot (b+c) = (a \cdot b) + (a \cdot c)\mathrm{~for~all~}a,b,c \in S.$$
If $\cdot$ is both left and right distributive over $+$, then it is said to be {\em distributive} over $+$ (or, alternatively, we may say that $\cdot$ {\em distributes over} $+$).</content>
</record>
