<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="1" id="4672">
 <title>proof of Tukey's lemma</title>
 <name>ProofOfTukeysLemma</name>
 <created>2003-08-29 21:59:44</created>
 <modified>2003-08-29 21:59:44</modified>
 <type>Proof</type>
<parent id="3693">Tukey's lemma</parent>
 <selfproof>0</selfproof>
 <creator id="127" name="Koro"/>
 <author id="1182" name="Larry Hammick"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="03E25"/>
 </classification>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}</preamble>
 <content>Let $S$ be a set and $F$ a set of subsets of $S$ such that $F$ is
of finite character. By Zorn's lemma, it is enough to show that
$F$ is inductive. For that, it will be enough to show that if
$(F_i)_{i\in I}$ is a family of elements of $F$ which is totally ordered
by inclusion, then the union $U$ of the $F_i$ is an element of $F$
as well (since $U$ is an upper bound on the family $(F_i)$).
So, let $K$ be a finite subset of $U$. Each element of
$U$ is in $F_i$ for some $i\in I$. Since $K$ is finite and
the $F_i$ are totally ordered by inclusion, there is some $j\in I$
such that all elements of $K$ are in $F_j$. That is, $K\subset F_j$.
Since $F$ is of finite character, we get $K\in F$, QED.</content>
</record>
