<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="12" id="5717">
 <title>completely Hausdorff</title>
 <name>CompletelyHausdorff</name>
 <created>2004-03-17 13:14:31</created>
 <modified>2007-09-14 09:52:23</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
 <creator id="13766" name="PrimeFan"/>
 <author id="12809" name="CompositeFan"/>
 <author id="409" name="mps"/>
 <author id="1858" name="matte"/>
 <author id="6075" name="rspuzio"/>
 <author id="3" name="drini"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="54D10"/>
 </classification>
 <synonyms>
	<synonym concept="completely Hausdorff" alias="completely Hausdorff space"/>
	<synonym concept="completely Hausdorff" alias="$T_{2\frac{1}{2}}$"/>
	<synonym concept="completely Hausdorff" alias="Urysohn space"/>
 </synonyms>
 <related>
	<object name="HausdorffSpaceNotCompletelyHausdorff"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>\usepackage{graphicx}
%\usepackage{xypic} 
\usepackage{bbm}
\newcommand{\Z}{\mathbbmss{Z}}
\newcommand{\C}{\mathbbmss{C}}
\newcommand{\R}{\mathbbmss{R}}
\newcommand{\Q}{\mathbbmss{Q}}
\newcommand{\mathbb}[1]{\mathbbmss{#1}}
\newcommand{\figura}[1]{\begin{center}\includegraphics{#1}\end{center}}
\newcommand{\figuraex}[2]{\begin{center}\includegraphics[#2]{#1}\end{center}}
\newtheorem{dfn}{Definition}

\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsthm}

\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{defn}{Definition}
\newtheorem{prop}{Proposition}
\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}
\newtheorem{cor}{Corollary}</preamble>
 <content>\begin{defn} \cite{steen}
Let $(X,\tau)$ be a topological space. 
Suppose that for any two different points $x,y\in X, x\neq y$, 
we can find two disjoint neighborhoods 
\[U_x,V_y\in \tau,\qquad x\in U_x, y\in Y_y\] such that their 
closures are also disjoint: 
\[\overline{U_x}\cap \overline{V_y}=\emptyset.\]
Then we say that $(X,\tau)$ is a 
\emph{completely Hausdorff space} or a \emph{$T_{2\frac12}$ space}. 
\end{defn}

\subsubsection*{Notes}
A synonym for functionally Hausdorff space is 
   \emph{Urysohn space} \cite{steen}. 
Unfortunately, the definition of completely Hausdorff and $T_{2\frac12}$ 
are not as standard as one would like since. For example, the
term completely Hausdorff space is also used to mean 
a functionally Hausdorff space (e.g. \cite{willard}).
Nevertheless, in the present convention, we have the implication:
\[
  \mbox{functionally Hausdorff}
    \Rightarrow
  \mbox{completely Hausdorff}
    \Rightarrow 
  T_2=\mbox{Hausdorff},
\]
which suggests why the $T_{2\frac12}$ name have been used to 
denote both completely Hausdorff spaces and functionally Hausdorff spaces.

\begin{thebibliography}{9}
\bibitem{steen} L.A. Steen, J.A.Seebach, Jr.,
\emph{Counterexamples in topology},
Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1970.
\bibitem{willard} S. Willard, \emph{General Topology},
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1970.
\end{thebibliography}</content>
</record>
