<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="15" id="5865">
 <title>characterisation</title>
 <name>Characterization</name>
 <created>2004-05-21 09:03:46</created>
 <modified>2007-10-24 15:50:14</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
<parent id="5001">property</parent>
 <creator id="2872" name="pahio"/>
 <author id="2872" name="pahio"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="00A05"/>
 </classification>
 <synonyms>
	<synonym concept="characterisation" alias="characterization"/>
	<synonym concept="characterisation" alias="defining property"/>
 </synonyms>
 <related>
	<object name="AlternativeDefinitionOfGroup"/>
	<object name="EquivalentFormulationsForContinuity"/>
	<object name="MultiplicationRuleGivesInverseIdeal"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>% this is the default PlanetMath preamble.  as your knowledge
% of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but
% it should be fine as is for beginners.

% almost certainly you want these
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
%\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
%\usepackage{xypic}

% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them

% define commands here</preamble>
 <content>In mathematics, {\em characterisation} usually means a property or a condition to define a certain notion. \,A notion may, under some presumptions, have different \PMlinkescapetext{equivalent} ways to define it.

For example, let $R$ be a commutative ring with non-zero unity (the presumption). \,Then the following are equivalent:

(1) All finitely generated regular ideals of $R$ are invertible.

(2) The \PMlinkescapetext{formula} \,$(a,\,b)(c,\,d) = (ac,\,bd,\,(a+b)(c+d))$\, for multiplying ideals of $R$ is valid always when at least one of the elements $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$ of $R$ is not zero-divisor.

(3) Every overring of $R$ is integrally closed.

Each of these conditions is sufficient (and necessary) for characterising and defining the Pr\"ufer ring.</content>
</record>
