<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="6" id="7286">
 <title>semimodular lattice</title>
 <name>SemimodularLattice</name>
 <created>2005-08-02 08:47:54</created>
 <modified>2007-04-12 08:49:25</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
 <creator id="409" name="mps"/>
 <author id="9802" name="lars_h"/>
 <author id="409" name="mps"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="06C10"/>
 </classification>
 <synonyms>
	<synonym concept="semimodular lattice" alias="upper semimodular lattice"/>
	<synonym concept="semimodular lattice" alias="lower semimodular lattice"/>
 </synonyms>
 <related>
	<object name="ModularLattice"/>
	<object name="IncidenceGeometry"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>% this is the default PlanetMath preamble.  as your knowledge
% of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but
% it should be fine as is for beginners.

% almost certainly you want these
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
%\usepackage{amsthm}

% making logically defined graphics
\usepackage{xypic}

% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them

% define commands here</preamble>
 <content>A lattice $L$ is {\em semimodular}
\footnote{Or {\em upper semimodular}, if one wants to stress the 
distinction with lower semimodular lattices.}
if for any $a$ and $b\in L$,
\[
  a \wedge b \prec a
  \quad\text{implies}\quad
  b \prec a \vee b,
\]
where $\prec$ denotes the covering relation in $L$.
Dually, a lattice $L$ is said to be \emph{lower semimodular} 
if for any $a$ and $b\in L$,
\[
  b \prec a \vee b
  \quad\text{implies}\quad
  a \wedge b \prec a.
\]
A chain finite lattice is \PMlinkname{modular}{ModularLattice} 
if and only if it is both semimodular and lower semimodular.


The smallest lattice which is semimodular but not modular is
\[\xymatrix{
    &amp; 1 \ar@{-}[ld] \ar@{-}[d] \ar@{-}[rd] &amp; \\
    a \ar@{-}[d] &amp; b \ar@{-}[ld] \ar@{-}[rd] &amp; c \ar@{-}[d] \\
    d \ar@{-}[rd] &amp; &amp; e \ar@{-}[ld] \\
    &amp; 0 &amp;
}\]
since $d \le a$ but $a \wedge (c \vee d) \neq (a \wedge c) \vee d$.</content>
</record>
