<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="11" id="7794">
 <title>Dilworth's theorem</title>
 <name>DilworthsTheorem</name>
 <created>2006-03-31 23:16:36</created>
 <modified>2007-06-24 10:06:10</modified>
 <type>Theorem</type>
 <creator id="3771" name="CWoo"/>
 <author id="13753" name="Mathprof"/>
 <author id="3771" name="CWoo"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="06A06"/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="06A07"/>
 </classification>
 <defines>
	<concept>chain covering number</concept>
 </defines>
 <synonyms>
	<synonym concept="Dilworth's theorem" alias="Dilworth chain decomposition theorem"/>
 </synonyms>
 <related>
	<object name="DualOfDilworthsTheorem"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb,amscd}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
%\usepackage{xypic}

% define commands here
\newtheorem*{thm}{Theorem}</preamble>
 <content>\begin{thm}  If $P$ is a poset with width $w&lt;\infty$, then $w$ is also the smallest integer such that $P$ can be written as the union of $w$ chains.
\end{thm}

\textbf{Remark}.  The smallest cardinal $c$ such that $P$ can be written as the union of $c$ chains is called the \emph{chain covering number} of $P$.  So Dilworth's theorem says that if the width of $P$ is finite, then it is equal to the chain covering number of $P$.  If $w$ is infinite, then statement is not true.  The proof of Dilworth's theorem and its counterexample in the infinite case can be found in the reference below.

\begin{thebibliography}{6}
\bibitem{jbn} J.B. Nation, ``Lattice Theory", \PMlinkexternal{http://www.math.hawaii.edu/~jb/lat1-6.pdf}{http://www.math.hawaii.edu/~jb/lat1-6.pdf}
\end{thebibliography}</content>
</record>
