<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="13" id="8197">
 <title>elementary results about multiplicative functions and convolution</title>
 <name>ElementaryResultsAboutMultiplicativeFunctionsAndConvolution</name>
 <created>2006-07-30 02:25:48</created>
 <modified>2007-06-27 09:07:05</modified>
 <type>Theorem</type>
<parent id="3097">multiplicative function</parent>
 <creator id="1863" name="Wkbj79"/>
 <author id="1863" name="Wkbj79"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="11A25"/>
 </classification>
 <related>
	<object name="ConvolutionInversesForArithmeticFunctions"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

\usepackage{psfrag}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{xypic}

\newtheorem*{thm*}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{lem}{Lemma}
\newtheorem*{cor*}{Corollary}</preamble>
 <content>\PMlinkescapeword{convolution}

One of the most important elementary results about multiplicative functions and \PMlinkname{convolution}{DirichletConvolution} is:

\begin{thm*}
If $f$, $g$, and $h$ are arithmetic functions with $f*g=h$ and at least two of them are multiplicative, then all of them are multiplicative.
\end{thm*}

The above theorem will be proven in two separate parts.

\begin{lem}
If $f$ and $g$ are multiplicative, then so is $f*g$.
\end{lem}

\begin{proof}
Note that $\displaystyle (f*g)(1)=f(1)g(1)=1 \cdot 1=1$ since $f$ and $g$ are multiplicative.

Let $a,b \in \mathbb{N}$ with $\gcd(a,b)=1$.  Then any divisor $d$ of $ab$ can be uniquely factored as $d=d_1d_2$, where $d_1$ divides $a$ and $d_2$ divides $b$.  When a divisor $d$ of $ab$ is factored in this manner, the fact that $\gcd(a,b)=1$ implies that $\gcd(d_1,d_2)=1$ and $\displaystyle \gcd \left( \frac{a}{d_1}, \frac{b}{d_2} \right)=1$.  Thus,

\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
$(f*g)(ab)$ &amp; $\displaystyle =\sum_{d|ab} f(d) g\left( \frac{ab}{d} \right)$ \\
&amp; $\displaystyle =\sum_{\substack{d_1|a \\ d_2|b}} f(d_1d_2) g\left( \frac{ab}{d_1d_2} \right)$ \\
&amp; $\displaystyle =\sum_{\substack{d_1|a \\ d_2|b}} f(d_1)f(d_2) g\left( \frac{a}{d_1} \right) g\left( \frac{b}{d_2} \right)$ \\
&amp; $\displaystyle =\left( \sum_{d_1|a} f(d_1) g\left( \frac{a}{d_1} \right) \right) \left( \sum_{d_2|b} f(d_2) g\left( \frac{b}{d_2} \right) \right)$ \\
&amp; $\displaystyle =(f*g)(a)(f*g)(b)$. \end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{proof}

\begin{lem}
If $f$ is an arithmetic function and $g$ and $h$ are multiplicative functions with $f*g=h$, then $f$ is multiplicative.
\end{lem}

\begin{proof}
Let $a,b \in \mathbb{N}$ with $\gcd(a,b)=1$.  Induction will be used on $ab$ to establish that $f(ab)=f(a)f(b)$.

If $ab=1$, then $a=b=1$.  Note that $f(1)=f(1) \cdot 1=f(1)g(1)=(f*g)(1)=h(1)=1$.  Thus, $f(ab)=f(1)=1=1 \cdot 1=f(a)f(b)$.

Now let $ab$ be an arbitrary natural number.  The induction hypothesis yields that, if $d_1$ divides $a$, $d_2$ divides $b$, and $d_1d_2&lt;ab$, then $f(d_1d_2)=f(d_1)f(d_2)$.  Thus,

\begin{center}
$\begin{array}{ll}
h(a)h(b) &amp; =h(ab) \\
\\
&amp; =(f*g)(ab) \\
\\
&amp; \displaystyle =\sum_{d|ab} f(d)g\left( \frac{ab}{d} \right) \\
\\
&amp; \displaystyle =f(ab)g(1)+\sum_{\substack{d|ab \\ d&lt;ab}} f(d)g\left( \frac{ab}{d} \right) \\
\\
&amp; \displaystyle =f(ab)\cdot 1+\sum_{\substack{d_1|a \\ d_2|b \\ d_1d_2&lt;ab}} f(d_1d_2)g\left( \frac{ab}{d_1d_2} \right) \\
\\
&amp; \displaystyle =f(ab)+\sum_{\substack{d_1|a \\ d_2|b \\ d_1d_2&lt;ab}} f(d_1)f(d_2)g\left( \frac{a}{d_1} \right) g\left( \frac{b}{d_2} \right) \\
\\
&amp; \displaystyle =f(ab)-f(a)f(b)g(1)g(1)+\sum_{\substack{d_1|a \\ d_2|b}} f(d_1)f(d_2)g\left( \frac{a}{d_1} \right) g\left( \frac{b}{d_2} \right) \\
\\
&amp; \displaystyle =f(ab)-f(a)f(b)\cdot 1 \cdot 1+\left( \sum_{d_1|a} f(d_1)g\left( \frac{a}{d_1} \right) \right) \left( \sum_{d_2|b} f(d_2)g\left( \frac{b}{d_2} \right) \right) \\
\\
&amp; =f(ab)-f(a)f(b)+(f*g)(a)(f*g)(b) \\
\\
&amp; =f(ab)-f(a)f(b)+h(a)h(b). \end{array}$
\end{center}

It follows that $f(ab)=f(a)f(b)$.
\end{proof}

The theorem follows from these two lemmas and the fact that convolution is commutative.

The theorem has an obvious corollary.

\begin{cor*}
If $f$ is multiplicative, then so is its convolution inverse.
\end{cor*}

\begin{proof}
Let $f$ be multiplicative.  Since $f(1) \neq 0$, $f$ has a convolution inverse $f^{-1}$.  (See convolution inverses for arithmetic functions for more details.)  Since $f*f^{-1}=\varepsilon$, where $\varepsilon$ denotes the convolution identity function, and both $f$ and $\varepsilon$ are multiplicative, the theorem yields that $f^{-1}$ is multiplicative.
\end{proof}</content>
</record>
