<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="7" id="8198">
 <title>proof that $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$ is quasi-compact</title>
 <name>ProofThatOperatornameSpecRIsQuasiCompact</name>
 <created>2006-07-30 03:15:39</created>
 <modified>2007-05-30 23:44:14</modified>
 <type>Proof</type>
<parent id="2898">prime spectrum</parent>
 <selfproof>0</selfproof>
 <creator id="1863" name="Wkbj79"/>
 <author id="1863" name="Wkbj79"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="14A15"/>
 </classification>
 <related>
	<object name="VIemptysetImpliesIR"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

\usepackage{psfrag}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{xypic}
</preamble>
 <content>Note that most of the notation used here is defined in the entry prime spectrum.

The following is a proof that $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$ is quasi-compact.

\begin{proof}
Let $\Lambda$ be an indexing set and $\displaystyle \left\{ U_{\lambda} \right\}_{\lambda \in \Lambda}$ be an open cover for $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$.  For every $\lambda \in \Lambda$, let $I_{\lambda}$ be an ideal of $R$ with $\displaystyle U_{\lambda}=\operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus V\left( I_{\lambda} \right)$.  Since

\begin{center}
$\begin{array}{ll}
\operatorname{Spec}(R) &amp; \displaystyle =\bigcup_{\lambda \in \Lambda} U_{\lambda} \\
&amp; \displaystyle =\bigcup_{\lambda \in \Lambda} \bigg( \operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus V\left( I_{\lambda} \right) \bigg) \\
&amp; \displaystyle =\operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus \bigcap_{\lambda \in \Lambda} V\left( I_{\lambda} \right) \\
&amp; \displaystyle =\operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus V\left( \sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda} I_{\lambda} \right), \end{array}$
\end{center}

$\displaystyle V\left( \sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda} I_{\lambda} \right)=\emptyset$.  Thus, by \PMlinkname{this theorem}{VIemptysetImpliesIR}, $\displaystyle \sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda} I_{\lambda} =R$.  Since $\displaystyle 1_R \in R=\sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda} I_{\lambda}$, there exists a finite subset $L$ of $\Lambda$ such that, for every $\ell \in L$, there exists an $i_{\ell} \in I_{\ell}$ with $\displaystyle 1_R=\sum_{\ell \in L} i_{\ell}$.

Let $r \in R$.  Then $\displaystyle r=r \cdot 1_R=r\sum_{\ell \in L} i_{\ell}=\sum_{\ell \in L} r \cdot i_{\ell} \in \sum_{\ell \in L} I_{\ell}$.  Thus, $\displaystyle \sum_{\ell \in L} I_{\ell}=R$.  Therefore, $\displaystyle V\left( \sum_{\ell \in L} I_{\ell} \right)=\emptyset$.  Since

\begin{center}
$\begin{array}{ll}
\operatorname{Spec}(R) &amp; \displaystyle =\operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus V\left( \sum_{\ell \in L} I_{\ell} \right) \\
&amp; \displaystyle =\operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus \bigcap_{\ell \in L} V\left( I_{\ell} \right) \\
&amp; \displaystyle =\bigcup_{\ell \in L} \bigg( \operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus V\left( I_{\ell} \right) \bigg) \\
&amp; \displaystyle =\bigcup_{\ell \in L} U_{\ell}, \end{array}$
\end{center}

$\displaystyle \left\{ U_{\lambda} \right\}_{\lambda \in \Lambda}$ restricts to a finite subcover.  It follows that $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$ is quasi-compact.
\end{proof}</content>
</record>
