<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="15" id="9409">
 <title>Beltrami-Klein model</title>
 <name>BeltramiKleinModel2</name>
 <created>2007-05-20 14:19:37</created>
 <modified>2007-06-25 17:14:52</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
<parent id="4669">non-Euclidean geometry</parent>
 <creator id="1863" name="Wkbj79"/>
 <author id="1863" name="Wkbj79"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="51-00"/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="51M10"/>
 </classification>
 <defines>
	<concept>pole</concept>
 </defines>
 <synonyms>
	<synonym concept="Beltrami-Klein model" alias="Klein-Beltrami model"/>
	<synonym concept="Beltrami-Klein model" alias="Klein model"/>
 </synonyms>
 <related>
	<object name="ConvertingBetweenTheBeltramiKleinModelAndThePoincareDiscModel"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{pstricks}
\usepackage{amsthm}</preamble>
 <content>The \emph{Beltrami-Klein model} for $\mathbb{H}^2$ is the disc $\{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 : x^2+y^2&lt;1 \}$ in which a point is similar to the Euclidean point and a line is defined to be a chord (excluding its endpoints) of the (circular) boundary.

\begin{center}
\begin{pspicture}(-2,-2)(2,2)
\pscircle[linestyle=dashed](0,0){2}
\psline{o-o}(-2,0)(1.414,1.414)
\end{pspicture}
\end{center}

The Beltrami-Klein model has the advantage that lines in the model resemble Euclidean lines; however, it has the drawback that it is not angle preserving.  That is, the Euclidean \PMlinkescapetext{measure} of an angle within the model is not necessarily the angle measure in hyperbolic geometry.

Some points outside of the Beltrami-Klein model are important for constructions within the model.  The following is an example of such:

Let $\ell$ be a line in the Beltrami-Klein model that is not a diameter of the circle.  The \emph{pole} of $\ell$ is the intersection of the Euclidean lines that are \PMlinkname{tangent}{TangentLine} to the circle at the endpoints of $\ell$.

\begin{center}
\begin{pspicture}(-3,-2)(3,5)
\pscircle[linestyle=dashed](0,0){2}
\psline{&lt;-&gt;}(-2,-2)(-2,5)
\psline{&lt;-&gt;}(-2.7172,5)(2.828,0.18)
\psline{o-o}(-2,0)(1.414,1.414)
\rput[a](0,0.7){$\ell$}
\psdots(-2,4.4)
\rput[l](-1.9,4.4){$P(\ell)$}
\rput[b](-2,-2){.}
\rput[b](-2.7172,5){.}
\rput[b](2.828,0.18){.}
\end{pspicture}
\end{center}

Poles are important for the following reason:  Given a line $\ell$ that is not a diameter of the Beltrami-Klein model, one constructs a line perpendicular to $\ell$ by considering Euclidean lines passing through $P(\ell)$.  Thus, given two disjointly parallel lines $\ell$ and $m$ that are not diameters of the Beltrami-Klein model, one constructs their common perpendicular by connecting their poles.

\begin{center}
\begin{pspicture}(-3,-3)(3,5.1)
\pscircle[linestyle=dashed](0,0){2}
\psline{&lt;-&gt;}(-2,-3)(-2,5)
\psline{&lt;-&gt;}(-2.7172,5)(2.828,0.18)
\psline{&lt;-&gt;}(-2.4,-0.7)(0.4,-2.8)
\psline{&lt;-&gt;}(-0.4,-2.8)(2.4,-0.7)
\psline{o-o}(-2,0)(1.414,1.414)
\rput[a](0,0.7){$\ell$}
\psline{o-o}(-1.2,-1.6)(1.2,-1.6)
\rput[b](0.8,-1.6){$m$}
\psdots(-2,4.4)(0,-2.5)
\rput[l](-1.9,4.4){$P(\ell)$}
\rput[l](0.2,-2.5){$P(m)$}
\rput[b](-2,-3){.}
\rput[b](-2.7172,5){.}
\rput[b](2.828,0.18){.}
\psline{&lt;-&gt;}(-2.2,5.09)(0.1,-2.845)
\rput[b](-1,1.4){$n$}
\end{pspicture}
\end{center}

In the above picture, $n$ is the common perpendicular of $\ell$ and $m$.</content>
</record>
