<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="1" id="9457">
 <title>inverses in rings</title>
 <name>InversesInRings</name>
 <created>2007-05-24 11:11:04</created>
 <modified>2007-05-24 11:11:04</modified>
 <type>Topic</type>
<parent id="354">ring</parent>
 <creator id="1863" name="Wkbj79"/>
 <author id="1863" name="Wkbj79"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="16-00"/>
 </classification>
 <defines>
	<concept>left invertible</concept>
	<concept>right invertible</concept>
	<concept>left inverse</concept>
	<concept>right inverse</concept>
 </defines>
 <related>
	<object name="Klein4Ring"/>
	<object name="LeftAndRightUnityOfRing"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{pstricks}
\usepackage{psfrag}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{xypic}
</preamble>
 <content>Let $R$ be a ring with unity $1$ and $r \in R$.  Then $r$ is \emph{left invertible} if there exists $q \in R$ with $qr=1$; $q$ is a \emph{left inverse} of $r$.  Similarly, $r$ is \emph{right invertible} if there exists $s \in R$ with $rs=1$; $s$ is a \emph{right inverse} of $r$.

Note that, if $r$ is left invertible, it may not have a unique left inverse, and similarly for right invertible elements.  On the other hand, if $r$ is left invertible and right invertible, then it has exactly one left inverse and one right inverse.  Moreover, these two \PMlinkescapetext{inverses} are equal, and $r$ is a unit.</content>
</record>
