|
|
![[parent]](http://images.planetmath.org:8080/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: primorials, not factorials''
by CompositeFan on 2006-06-15 17:31:45 |
|
| | Of course any finite sequence of primes will do. I personally find the sequence of the first x consecutive primes the most convincing. Euclid's proof is more geometric than number-theoretic, and you know what scientists say about my gender's ability to handle space-time-oriented stuff as opposed to feelings-oriented stuff. ;) |
| | [ reply | up | top ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
