|
|
Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: please read before editing indexing set''
by ratboy on 2006-07-31 22:05:32 |
|
| The expression "s_\lambda" is usually understood to be a stylistic variant of "s(\lambda)". How are you interpreting it so as to make sense of "This notation means that, if a surjection $f$ were explicitly defined, then $f(\lambda)=s_\lambda$ for every $\lambda \in \Lambda$"?
|
| | [ reply | up | top ] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|