|
|
![[parent]](http://images.planetmath.org:8080/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: alternative notation''
by yark on 2006-09-17 14:24:17 |
|
| Wkbj79 wrote (three months ago):
> I guess that is the force of my complaint
> about the notation H char G: that it's not
> very elegant. I also don't like the fact
> that it in no way resembles the other group
> inclusion notations, such as "is a subgroup of"
> and "is a normal subgroup of".
In fact there are a number of similar notations for subgroups - char just happens to be the most common. Here are those I can think of off-hand:
H asc G (ascendant)
H char G (characteristic)
H per G (permutable)
H sn G (subnormal)
|
| | [ reply | up | top ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
