|
|
Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: Why convex?''
by mps on 2007-02-26 10:21:32 |
|
| > Why is this called "convexity conjecture"? I've read the > reference, too, and they don't explain it at all.
Here's a first approximation: if $\pi$ were a convex function, then it would follow that \[ \pi( (x+y)/2 ) \le (\pi(x) + \pi(y)) / 2. \] But \pi( (x+y)/2 ) doesn't make sense if $x+y$ is odd, so let's drop the 2s: \[ \pi(x + y) \le \pi(x) + \pi(y). \] I'm a bit uneasy about this, since $\pi(x/2)$ is not the same as $\pi(x)/2$, but that may also be the reason Crandall and Pomerance put ``convexity'' in scare quotes.
I hope an analyst will pop in to clear things up. |
| | [ reply | up | top ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|