PlanetMath:

PlanetMath

(more info)

Math for the people, by the people.

Sponsor PlanetMath

donor list - find out how

Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS

Login

Main Menu

sections Encyclopædia
Papers
Books
Expositions

meta Requests (236)
Orphanage
Unclass'd (1)
Unproven (540)
Corrections (46)
Classification

talkback Polls
Forums
Feedback
Bug Reports

downloads Snapshots
PM Book

information News
Docs
Wiki
ChangeLog
TODO List
Copyright
About

[parent]

Viewing Message

``Re: Proof'' by pahio on 2007-12-24 17:47:29

There is no cause to use imaginary numbers in such a formula concerning real numbers.

[ reply | up | top ]

Re: Proof by mathcam on 2007-12-26 16:10:46
- Re: Proof by pahio on 2007-12-26 17:10:42
  - Re: Proof by mathcam on 2007-12-26 20:02:41
    - Re: Proof by pahio on 2007-12-27 09:23:28
      - Re: Proof by mathcam on 2007-12-27 11:25:11
        
        Re: Proof by rm50 on 2007-12-27 12:48:48
        Re: Proof by pahio on 2007-12-28 12:28:53
        
        Re: Proof by mathcam on 2007-12-28 14:25:58
        
        Re: Proof by pahio on 2007-12-28 15:03:33
        
        Re: Proof by rm50 on 2007-12-28 15:13:59
        
        Re: Proof by pahio on 2007-12-28 15:57:05
        
        Re: Proof by pahio on 2007-12-28 16:01:31
    - Re: Proof by pahio on 2007-12-28 12:17:09

Interact

reply