|
|
Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: Did James Constant find the proof?''
by dh2718 on 2008-03-26 11:01:34 |
|
| No, he did not. At least his "proof" is short and clear enough, so that his mistakes are easy to find. He also declares that the question why his "proof" holds for exponents greater than 2, but not for 2, is "beyond this paper"...
|
| | [ reply | up | top ] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|