|
|
![[parent]](http://images.planetmath.org:8080/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: Category of Sets, according to MacLane''
by yark on 2008-06-12 05:07:28 |
|
| jkauzlar writes:
> the texts I looked at don't make it especially clear why,
> if the arrows represent morphisms between objects (sets),
> then why every set doesn't point to every other set
There is no function from a non-empty set to the empty set. |
| | [ reply | up | top ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
