PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
[parent] Viewing Message
``Re: Exciting Problem'' by lynx on 2008-07-09 11:55:01
I computed by hand (and a calculator) in the following way:

Take the number of positive integers of the form 3k+2 less or equal than X=6008819575 which is (X-1)/3 (i.e. [(X-2)/3]+1, where [y] is the integer part of y),

subtract by the number of positive integers of the form p(3k+e_p) (\leq X) with p be prime factor of X (i.e. p=5,11,17,23,29,41 or 47) and e_p=1 (if p=2mod3) or e_p=2 (if p=1mod3) (this means that p(3k+e_p)=2mod3). Fortunally e_p=1 for all p, thus the number of pos. int. of the form p(3k+1) less equal than X is

\sum_{p=5,11,17,...,47}((X/p)+1)/3

(note that ((X/p)+1)/3=[((X/p)-1)/3]+1)

then we sum the number of positive integers of the form pq(3k+2) (\leq X) with p and q be two distinct prime factors of X which is equal to

\sum_{pq=5*11,5*17,...,41*47}((X/pq)-1)/3

Then we subtract by

\sum_{pqr=5*11*17,...,29*41*47}((X/pqr)+1)/3

and go on, at the end we subtract by

((X/5*11*...*47)+1)/3

so the final result is

(1/3)*(X(1-1/5)(1-1/11)(1-1/23)...(1-1/47) -2^7)=
(1/3)*(5*4*10*22*...*46 - 128)=
1209002624

I made the mistake of considering [(X-2)/3]+1 equal to (X+2)/3 instead (X-1)/3.

I recognize this explanation is a mess but I hope you are able to understand it after think on it.
[ reply | up | top ]
Interact
reply