|
|
Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``f(1)=1 dangerous''
by AxelBoldt on 2003-11-19 18:04:40 |
|
| The f(1)=1 requirement for unitary rings has the following consequence: it is possible that f:R->S and g:S->T are ring homomorphisms, yet gf:R->T is not. So rings together with ring homomorphisms do not form a category.
So maybe one should distinguish between a "homomorphism of rings" and a "homomorphism of unitary rings". |
| | [ reply | up ] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|