|
|
![[parent]](http://images.planetmath.org:8080/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: f(1)=1 dangerous''
by mclase on 2003-11-22 09:34:34 |
|
| Can you elaborate?
I can think of a couple of older ring theory books by Canadian authors which do not require identities: Herstein's "Noncommutative Rings" and Divinsky's "Rings and Radicals".
Is this what you had in mind?
- Michael
|
| | [ reply | up | top ] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
