|
|
![[parent]](http://images.planetmath.org:8080/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Use the more general definition?''
by mnemophobe on 2004-05-10 03:29:27 |
|
| The definition of (Weil) Divisor seems a bit too specialized here, at least from an algebraic geometer's point of view. I think the more general definition of a divisor as an element of the free abelian group generated by the prime divisors would be preferable here (a la Hartshorne).
|
| | [ reply | up ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
