|
|
Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: the infinity-norm''
by maddoxj on 2004-09-26 12:01:06 |
|
| To Whom It May Concern,
I have to agree with Lachlan. You would not swap the indices, you would swap their upper bounds. The sum should be over n, and i should be bounded thusly: 1<=i<=m. Otherwise, the sum will not account for all the elements of the ith row in the event that m<n, and in the evaluation of the maximum, all the rows will not be accounted for in the event that n<m.
James |
| | [ reply | up | top ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|