|
|
![[parent]](http://images.planetmath.org:8080/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: algebra or ring''
by HkBst on 2004-10-17 09:26:11 |
|
| But logically it should be defined for something which I will call here a nonassociative ring. The extra operation of scalar multiplication that an algebra has over a ring is superfluous.
Hmmm, it also seems there is no definition of a generalized ring on PM. Maybe I will make an entry sorting this stuff out. |
| | [ reply | up | top ] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
