|
|
![[parent]](http://images.planetmath.org:8080/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: algebra or ring''
by CWoo on 2004-10-17 19:31:00 |
|
| You should be careful when using the phrase "nonassociative ring" since it implies the exclusion of any "associative" ring, unless this is exactly your intent. I prefer the naming of a "generalized ring" to include both the traditional "associative" rings as well as the nonassociative ones. I am not aware of any other naming convention for a "generalized" ring in the mathematical community.
But to avoid any more confusion, please add an entry and let's go from there.
Chi |
| | [ reply | up | top ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
