|
|
![[parent]](http://images.planetmath.org:8080/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: Hypergraphs''
by marijke on 2005-03-31 01:39:29 |
|
| > even better, go ahead and make the changes your self so you can
> improve it the best way you see fit
Thanks but... i didn't think the article was bad, just that it was worth mentioning these critters also go by the name "incidence structures". In case somebody looks for them by that name.
At the moment i'm till over my ears in
* making those pictures for $k$-connected graphs (my first article
here, an adopted orphan) that were requested, of the previous
custodian, about a year ago -- just finished the pix offline, now
going to find out how to put them in here. Perhaps the kind of
topic that hangs off a parent topic (whatever that setup is called
again) would be a good idea. On the case.
* cleaning up [closed] paths, trails, walks etc., my second article
-- just done that
* writing the Coxeter groups article -- i find it is getting far
too long for an encyclop{\ae}dia entry, is there another format
for more in-depth articles?
So no i'm not exactly jumping at the chance right now to edit Hypergraphs ;^)
It's a good job i'm having 4 weeks holiday between terms at the moment... --- and 'flu :( lousy for going outside and doing things, but it doesn't seem to affect writing and thinking much.
...i hope <ggg>.
--regards, marijke
http://web.mat.bham.ac.uk/marijke/ |
| | [ reply | up | top ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
