|
|
![[parent]](http://images.planetmath.org:8080/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: Negative primes (seeking comment)''
by akrowne on 2005-10-18 12:57:14 |
|
| Its not an issue of "better" or "more correct": its an issue of how the primes are usually defined. It was my understanding the normal definition excludes negatives; and you have to explicitly include negatives to consider them. I'll put a clarification in the entry, but can anyone else comment on conventions?
apk |
| | [ reply | up | top ] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
