|
|
![[parent]](http://images.planetmath.org:8080/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Message
|
|
|
| ``Re: Update: "Trans-inductive Posets"''
by rspuzio on 2006-02-19 20:32:17 |
|
| | Since the term "trans-inductive" suggests that the motivation for the definition, (it is a suitable setting for induction) I would prefer it. The only comment I would add is that maybe the prefix "trans-" might not be necessary --- wouldn't "inductive poset" suffice? |
| | [ reply | up | top ] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
