|
|
Viewing Correction to 'unit'
|
R commutative? by mclase Correction id: 1205 Filed on: 2002-11-05 18:25:21 Status: Accepted on 2002-11-05 22:15:49 Type: Erratum
Correction text:
Although you've given a general ring theory MSC, this definition isn't correct for non-commutative rings.
In general, xy = 1 does not imply yx = 1. (e.g. End_K(V) for an infinite dimensional K-vector space V.)
And I think it is not usual to use terms like "divides" in non-commutative ring theory. | Comment from object owner drini:
I never noticed it would fail on noncommutative rings. If you would like to write about the distinct definitions in order to get a better entry , just drop me a note and I'll add you to the editors group for this entry
Meanwhile, I'm just changing the msc code ;) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|