|
|
Viewing Correction to 'non-commutative rings of order four'
|
title by pahio Correction id: 12149 Filed on: 2007-05-26 03:22:46 Status: Rejected on 2007-05-30 15:10:42 Type: Meta/Minor
Correction text:
| Is it correct to speak of the order of an ring? The groups have own orders, the Galois fields too. | Comment from object owner Wkbj79:
| Based off of the posts made to this correction as well as my own feelings, I have decided to keep "order", at least for the time being. We got an interesting string of posts out of all this though. :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|