|
|
![[parent]](http://images.planetmath.org:8080/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Correction to 'Urysohn's lemma'
|
Not actually incorrect, by mathcam
Correction id: 13456
Filed on: 2008-01-22 09:42:55
Status: Rejected on 2008-01-22 12:54:56
Type: Erratum
Correction text:
but I think it might as well read f(A)={0} and f(B)={1} in the last line, instead of using f(A)\subset{0}, etc.
Cam
|
Comment from object owner yark:
| If A is empty, then f(A) is empty, making f(A)={0} impossible. So your version is actually incorrect. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
