|
|
![[parent]](http://images.planetmath.org:8080/images/uparrow.png) Viewing Correction to 'simple module'
|
need one more condition by smw
Correction id: 6898
Filed on: 2005-07-20 12:55:36
Status: Accepted on 2005-09-26 14:25:29
Type: Meta/Minor
Correction text:
This is sort of nit-picky but,
A simple (left) R-module M also needs to be nontrivial in some sense.
Hungerford's "Algebra" says we need RM \neq 0.
Lang's "Algebra" says we need $M \neq 0$. |
No comment from object owner bwebste.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
