|
|
|
|
proof of Morera's theorem
|
(Proof)
|
|
|
We provide a proof of Morera's theorem under the hypothesis that
for any circuit $\Gamma$ contained in $G$ . This is apparently more restrictive, but actually equivalent, to supposing
for any triangle $\Delta\subseteq G$ , provided that $f$ is continuous in $G$ .
The idea is to prove that $f$ has an antiderivative $F$ in $G$ . Then $F$ , being holomorphic in $G$ , will have derivatives of any order in $G$ ; but $F^{(n)}(z)=f^{(n-1)}(z)$ for all $z\in G$ , $n\in\mathbb{N}$ , $n\geq 1$ .
First, suppose $G$ is connected. Then $G$ , being open, is also pathwise connected.
Fix $z_0\in G$ . For any $z\in G$ define $F(z)$ as \begin{equation} \label{eq:antid} F(z) = \int_{\gamma(z_0,z)}f(w)dw\;, \end{equation}where $\gamma(z_0,z)$ is a path entirely contained in $G$ with initial point $z_0$ and final point $z$ .
The function $F:G\to\mathbb{C}$ is well defined. In fact, let $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$ be any two paths entirely contained in $G$ with initial point $z_0$ and final point $z$ ; define a circuit $\Gamma$ by joining $\gamma_1$ and $-\gamma_2$ , the path obtained from $\gamma_2$ by ``reversing the parameter direction''. Then by linearity and additivity of integral \begin{equation} \label{eq:wd} \int_\Gamma f(w)dw =\int_{\gamma_1}f(w)dw+\int_{-\gamma_2}f(w)dw =\int_{\gamma_1}f(w)dw-\int_{\gamma_2}f(w)dw\;; \end{equation}but the left-hand side is 0 by hypothesis, thus the two integrals on the right-hand side are equal.
We must now prove that $F'=f$ in $G$ . Given $z\in G$ , there exists $r>0$ such that the ball $B_r(z)$ of radius $r$ centered in $z$ is contained in $G$ . Suppose $0<|\Delta{z}|<r$ : then we can choose as a path from $z$ to $z+\Delta{z}$ the segment $\gamma:[0,1]\to G$ parameterized by $t\mapsto z+t\Delta{z}$ . Write $f=u+iv$ with
$u,v:G\to\mathbb{R}$ : by additivity of integral and the mean value theorem, \begin{equation} \label{eq:ir} \frac{F(z+\Delta{z})-F(z)}{\Delta{z}} =\frac{1}{\Delta{z}}\int_{\gamma}f(w)dw =\frac{1}{\Delta{z}}\int_0^1f(z+t\Delta{z})\Delta{z}dt =u(z+\theta_u\Delta{z})+iv(z+\theta_v\Delta{z}) \end{equation}for some $\theta_u,\theta_v\in(0,1)$ . Since $f$ is continuous, so are $u$ and $v$ , and $\lim_{\Delta{z}\to 0}\frac{F(z+\Delta{z})-F(z)}{\Delta{z}}=u(z)+iv(z)=f(z)$ .
In the general case, we just repeat the procedure once for each connected component of $G$ .
|
"proof of Morera's theorem" is owned by Ziosilvio.
|
|
(view preamble | get metadata)
Cross-references: connected component, theorem, mean, segment, radius, ball, side, integral, additivity, well defined, function, point, initial point, path, fix, pathwise connected, open, connected, order, derivatives, holomorphic, antiderivative, continuous, triangle, equivalent, contained, circuit, hypothesis
This is version 6 of proof of Morera's theorem, born on 2009-04-16, modified 2009-04-20.
Object id is 11740, canonical name is ProofOfMorerasTheorem.
Accessed 585 times total.
Classification:
| AMS MSC: | 30D20 (Functions of a complex variable :: Entire and meromorphic functions, and related topics :: Entire functions, general theory) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pending Errata and Addenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|