PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] inductive proof of binomial theorem (Proof)

We prove the theorem for a ring. We do not assume a unit for the ring. We do not need commutativity of the ring, but only that $a$ and $b$ commute.

When $n=1$ , the result is clear.

For the inductive step, assume it holds for $m$ . Then for $n = m+1$ , \begin{eqnarray*} (a+b)^{m+1} & = & (a+b)(a+b)^m \\ & = & (a+b)(a^m + b^m+ \sum_{k=1}^{m-1} \binom{m}{k} a^{m-k} b^k )\text{ by the inductive hypothesis} \\ & = & a^{m+1} + b^{m+1} + ab^m + ba^m + \sum_{k=1}^{m-1} \binom{m}{k} a^{m-k+1} b^k + \sum_{k=1}^{m-1} \binom{m}{k} a^{m-k} b^{k+1} \\ & = & a^{m+1} + b^{m+1} + \sum_{k=1}^m \binom{m}{k} a^{m-k+1} b^k + \sum_{k=0}^{m-1} \binom{m}{k} a^{m-k} b^{k+1} \text{ by combining terms} \\ & = & a^{m+1} + b^{m+1} + \sum_{k=1}^m \binom{m}{k} a^{m-k+1} b^k + \sum_{j=1}^m \binom{m}{j-1} a^{m+1-j} b^j \text{ let j=k+1 in second sum} \\ & = & a^{m+1} + b^{m+1} + \sum_{k=1}^m \left[ \binom{m}{k} + \binom{m}{k-1} \right] a^{m+1-k}b^k \text{ by combining the sums}\\ & = & a^{m+1} + b^{m+1} + \sum_{k=1}^m \binom{m+1}{k} a^{m+1-k}b^k \text{ from Pascal's rule} \\ \end{eqnarray*}as desired.




"inductive proof of binomial theorem" is owned by Mathprof. [ full author list (2) | owner history (1) ]
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

Keywords:  number theory

This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: clear, commutativity, unit, ring, theorem

This is version 16 of inductive proof of binomial theorem, born on 2001-10-18, modified 2006-06-13.
Object id is 338, canonical name is InductiveProofOfBinomialTheorem.
Accessed 26903 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC05A10 (Combinatorics :: Enumerative combinatorics :: Factorials, binomial coefficients, combinatorial functions)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 3 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
Sups and infs by russ42897 on 2003-11-09 18:18:55
I wanted some hints on this problem. Let f be a bounded function on interval I, prove that
sup({-f(x): x in I}) = -inf({f(x): x in I}).






[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)