PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] example of a probabilistic proof (Example)

Our example is the existence of $k$ -paradoxical tournaments. The proof hinges upon the following basic probabilistic inequality, for any events $A$ and $B$ ,$$ P\left(A \cup B \right) \leq P(A) + P(B)$$

Theorem 1   For every $k$ , there exists a $k$ -paradoxical tournament.
Proof. We will construct a tournament $T$ on $n$ vertices. We will show that for $n$ large enough, a $k$ -paradoxical tournament must exist. The probability space in question is all possible directions of the arrows of $T$ , where each arrow can point in either direction with probability $1/2$ , independently of any other arrow.

We say that a set $K$ of $k$ vertices is arrowed by a vertex $v_0$ outside the set if every arrow between $v_0$ to $w_i \in K$ points from $v_0$ to $w_i$ , for $i = 1, ~\ldots, k$ . Consider a fixed set $K$ of $k$ vertices and a fixed vertex $v_0$ outside $K$ . Thus, there are $k$ arrows from $v_0$ to $K$ , and only one arrangement of these arrows permits $K$ to be arrowed by $v_0$ , thus$$ P(K ~\mbox{ is arrowed by }~ v_0) = \frac{1}{2^k}.$$ The complementary event, is therefore,$$ P(K ~\mbox{ is \emph{not} arrowed by }~ v_0) = 1 - \frac{1}{2^k}.$$ By independence, and because there are $n - k$ vertices outside of $K$ , \begin{equation} \label{kk} P(K ~\mbox{ is not arrowed by \emph{any} vertex}) = \left(1 - \frac{1}{2^k}\right)^{n-k}. \end{equation}Lastly, since there are $\binom{n}{k}$ sets of cardinality $k$ in $T$ , we employ the inequality mentioned above to obtain that for the union of all events of the form in equation ([*])$$ P(\text{Some set of $k$ vertices is not arrowed by any vertex}) \leq \binom{n}{k}\left(1 - \frac{1}{2^k}\right)^{n-k}.$$ If the probability of this last event is less than $1$ for some $n$ , then there must exist a $k$ -paradoxical tournament of $n$ vertices. Indeed there is such an $n$ , since \begin{eqnarray*} \binom{n}{k}\left(1 - \frac{1}{2^k} \right)^{n-k} &=& \frac{1}{k!} n(n-1) \cdots (n-k+1) \left(1 - \frac{1}{2^k} \right)^{n-k} \\ &<& \frac{1}{k!} n^k \left(1 - \frac{1}{2^k} \right)^{n-k} \end{eqnarray*} Therefore, regarding $k$ as fixed while $n$ tends to infinity, the right-hand-side above tends to zero. In particular, for some $n$ it is less than $1$ , and the result follows. $ \qedsymbol$




"example of a probabilistic proof" is owned by bbukh. [ full author list (3) | owner history (1) ]
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:


This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: infinity, equation, union, cardinality, complementary, fixed set, point, probability space, vertices, events, inequality, proof, tournaments

This is version 10 of example of a probabilistic proof, born on 2002-10-21, modified 2006-11-25.
Object id is 3530, canonical name is ExamplesOfProbabilisticProofs.
Accessed 2899 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC05C80 (Combinatorics :: Graph theory :: Random graphs)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 3 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)