PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Medium Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] proof of Wedderburn's theorem (Proof)

We want to show that the multiplication operation in a finite division ring is abelian.

We denote the centralizer in $D$ of an element $x$ as $C_D(x)$ .

Lemma. The centralizer is a subring.

$0$ and $1$ are obviously elements of $C_D(x)$ and if $y$ and $z$ are, then $x(-y) = -(xy) = -(yx) = (-y)x$ , $x(y+z)=xy+xz=yx+zx=(y+z)x$ and $x(yz)=(xy)z=(yx)z=y(xz)=y(zx)=(yz)x$ , so $-y,y+z$ , and $yz$ are also elements of $C_D(x)$ . Moreover, for $y\neq 0$ , $xy=yx$ implies $y^{-1}x=xy^{-1}$ , so $y^{-1}$ is also an element of $C_D(x)$ .

Now we consider the center of $D$ which we'll call $Z(D)$ . This is also a subring and is in fact the intersection of all centralizers.

$$ Z(D)=\bigcap_{x\in D}C_D(x) $$

$Z(D)$ is an abelian subring of $D$ and is thus a field. We can consider $D$ and every $C_D(x)$ as vector spaces over $Z(D)$ of dimension $n$ and $n_x$ respectively. Since $D$ can be viewed as a module over $C_D(x)$ we find that $n_x$ divides $n$ . If we put $q:=|Z(D)|$ , we see that $q\geq 2$ since $\{0,1\}\subset Z(D)$ , and that $|C_D(x)|=q^{n_x}$ and $|D|=q^n$ .

It suffices to show that $n=1$ to prove that multiplication is abelian, since then $|Z(D)|=|D|$ and so $Z(D)=D$ .

We now consider $D^*:=D-\{0\}$ and apply the conjugacy class formula.

$$ |D^*| = |Z(D^*)| + \sum_{x} [D^*:C_{D^*}(x)] $$

which gives

$$ q^n-1 = q-1 + \sum_{x} \frac{q^n-1}{q^{n_x}-1}$$ .

By Zsigmondy's theorem, there exists a prime $p$ that divides $q^n-1$ but doesn't divide any of the $q^m-1$ for $0<m<n$ , except in 2 exceptional cases which will be dealt with separately. Such a prime $p$ will divide $q^n-1$ and each of the $\frac{q^n-1}{q^{n_x}-1}$ . So it will also divide $q-1$ which can only happen if $n=1$ .

We now deal with the 2 exceptional cases. In the first case $n$ equals $2$ , which would mean $D$ is a vector space of dimension 2 over $Z(D)$ , with elements of the form $a+b\alpha$ where $a,b\in Z(D)$ . Such elements clearly commute so $D=Z(D)$ which contradicts our assumption that $n=2$ . In the second case, $n=6$ and $q=2$ . The class equation reduces to $64-1=2-1+\sum_{x} \frac{2^6-1}{2^{n_x}-1}$ where $n_x$ divides 6. This gives $62=63x+21y+9z$ with $x,y$ and $z$ integers, which is impossible since the right hand side is divisible by 3 and the left hand side isn't.




"proof of Wedderburn's theorem" is owned by lieven.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:


This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: left hand side, divisible, right hand side, integers, class equation, prime, Zsigmondy's theorem, conjugacy class formula, divides, module, dimension, vector spaces, field, intersection, center, implies, subring, centralizer, abelian, division ring, operation, multiplication

This is version 5 of proof of Wedderburn's theorem, born on 2002-11-28, modified 2008-04-14.
Object id is 3627, canonical name is ProofOfWedderburnsTheorem.
Accessed 8062 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC12E15 (Field theory and polynomials :: General field theory :: Skew fields, division rings)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 5 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
centralizer link refers to group centralizer definition by remag12 on 2005-02-26 20:05:46
Thecentralizer link refers to the group element centralizer definition, not the definition of a centralizer of a ring element.
 S. A. G.
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)