PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very low Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
Smarandache n-structure (Definition)

In any domain of knowledge, a Smarandache $n$ -structure, for $n \geqslant 2$ , on a set $S$ means a weak structure $w_0$ on $S$ such that there exists a chain of proper subsets $P_{n-1} \subset P_{n-2} \subset \cdots \subset P_2 \subset P_1 \subset S$ whose corresponding structures satisfy the inverse inclusion chain $w_{n-1} \succ w_{n-2} \succ \dots \succ w_2 \succ w_1 \succ w_0$ , where $\succ$ signifies strictly stronger (i.e., structure satisfying more axioms).

By proper subset one understands a subset different from the empty set, from the idempotent if any, and from the whole set.

Now one defines the weak structure:

Let $A$ be a set, $B$ a proper subset of it, $\phi$ an operation on $A$ , and $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_k, a_{k+1}, \ldots, a_{k+m}$ be $k+m$ independent axioms, where $k, m \geqslant 1$ .
If the operation $\phi$ on the set $A$ satisfies the axioms $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_k$ and does not satisfy the axioms $a_{k+1}, \ldots, a_{k+m}$ , while on the subset $B$ the operation $\phi$ satisfies the axioms $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_k, a_{k+1}, \ldots, a_{k+m}$ , one says that structure $w_A=(A, \phi)$ is weaker than structure $w_B=(B, \phi)$ and one writes $w_A \prec w_B$ , or one says that $w_B$ is stronger than structure $w_A$ and one writes $w_B \succ w_A$ .
But if $\phi$ satisfies the same axioms on $A$ as on $B$ one says that structures $w_A$ and $w_B$ are equal and one writes $w_A=w_B$ .
When $\phi$ satisfies the same axioms or less axioms on $A$ than on $B$ one says that structures $w_A$ is weaker than or equal to structure $w_B$ and one writes $w_A \preceq w_B$ , or $w_B$ is stronger than or equal to $w_B$ and one writes $w_B \succeq w_A$ .
For example a semigroup is a structure weaker than a group structure.

This definition can be extended to structures with many operations $(A, \phi_1, \phi_2, \ldots, \phi_r)$ for $r \geqslant 2$ . Thus, let $A$ be a set and $B$ a proper subset of it.
a) If $(A, \phi_{i}) \preceq (B, \phi_{i})$ for all $1 \leq i \leq r$ , then $(A, \phi_1, \phi_2, \ldots, \phi_r) \preceq (B, \phi_1, \phi_2, \ldots, \phi_r)$ .
b) If $\exists i_0 \in \{1, 2, \ldots, r\}$ such that $(A, \phi_{i_0}) \prec (B, \phi_{i_0})$ and $(A, \phi_i) \preceq (B, \phi_i)$ for all $i \ne i_0$ , then $(A, \phi_1, \phi_2, \ldots, \phi_r) \prec (B, \phi_1, \phi_2, \ldots, \phi_r)$ .
In this case, for two operations, a ring is a structure weaker than a field structure.

This definition comprises large classes of structures, some more important than others.

As a particular case, in abstract algebra, a Smarandache 2-algebraic structure (two levels only of structures in algebra) on a set $S$ , is a weak algebraic structure $w_0$ on $S$ such that there exists a proper subset $P$ of $S$ , which is embedded with a stronger algebraic structure $w_1$ .
For example: a Smarandache semigroup is a semigroup (different from a group) which has a proper subset that is a group.
Other examples: a Smarandache groupoid of first order is a groupoid (different from a semigroup) which has a proper subset that is a semigroup, while a Smarandache groupoid of second order is a groupoid (different from a semigroup) which has a proper subset that is a group. And so on.

References:
1. Digital Library of Science:
2. W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, Smarandache Algebraic Structures, book series: (Vol. I: Groupoids; Vol. II: Semigroups; Vol. III: Semirings, Semifields, and Semivector Spaces; Vol. IV: Loops; Vol. V: Rings; Vol. VI: Near-rings; Vol. VII: Non-associative Rings; Vol. VIII: Bialgebraic Structures; Vol. IX: Fuzzy Algebra; Vol. X: Linear Algebra), Am. Res. Press & Bookman, Martinsville, 2002-2003.




"Smarandache n-structure" is owned by jonnathan.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: Florentin Smarandache

Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: linear algebra, non-associative, near-rings, loops, semifields, semirings, groupoids, algebraic, references, second order, first order, groupoid, algebraic structure, levels, algebra, classes, field, ring, group, semigroup, independent, operation, idempotent, empty set, subset, axioms, stronger, strictly, inclusion, inverse, proper subsets, chain, structure, Smarandache

This is version 26 of Smarandache n-structure, born on 2004-04-15, modified 2006-09-17.
Object id is 5770, canonical name is SmarandacheNStructures.
Accessed 2267 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC08A05 (General algebraic systems :: Algebraic structures :: Structure theory)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 4 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy
Smarandache semigroup by mclase on 2004-04-16 18:49:34
I don't want to comment on the entry in general, but I can't see that the notion of Smarandache semigroup is very useful.

It is well-known from the structure theory of semigroups, that many semigroups contain groups, and they are an important part of its structure.

Moreover, every finite semigroup contains an idempotent, which is trivially a subgroup. This means that every finite semigroup that is not actually a group is a Smarandache semigroup.

So what does the notion of Smarandache semigroup add?

- Michael
[ reply | up ]

Interact
post | correct | update request | add derivation | add example | add (any)