PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] proof that a finite collection of sets will not suffice (Proof)

Suppose that you cut $[0,1]$ into $A_0,...,A_n$ Displacing the parts is simply translating them; you can suppose that you leave $A_0$ in place and translate all the others to the right. Let $\epsilon$ be the smallest translation length : if after translation the union contains $[0,1]$ necessarily $[0,\epsilon] \subset A_0$ A contradiction ensues.




"proof that a finite collection of sets will not suffice" is owned by rspuzio.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:


This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: contradiction, contains, union, length, translation, right, translate, place, cut

This is version 1 of proof that a finite collection of sets will not suffice, born on 2004-09-25.
Object id is 6234, canonical name is ProofThatAFiniteCollectionOfSetsWillNotSuffice.
Accessed 1085 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC28E99 (Measure and integration :: Miscellaneous topics in measure theory :: Miscellaneous)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)