|
|
|
|
infimum and supremum for real numbers
|
(Topic)
|
|
|
Suppose $A$ is a non-empty subset of
. If $A$ is bounded from above, then the axioms of the real numbers imply that there exists a least upper bound for $A$ . That is, there exists an
such that
- $m$ is an upper bound for $A$ , that is, $a\le m$ for all $a\in A$ ,
- if $M$ is another upper bound for $A$ , then $m\le M$ .
Such a number $m$ is called the supremum of $A$ , and it is denoted by $\sup A$ . It is easy to see that there can be only one least upper bound. If $m_1$ and $m_2$ are two least upper bounds for $A$ . Then $m_1\le m_2$ and $m_2\le m_1$ , and $m_1=m_2$ .
Next, let us consider a set $A$ that is bounded from below. That is, for some
we have $m\le a$ for all $a\in A$ . Then we say that
is a a greatest lower bound for $A$ if
- $M$ is an lower bound for $A$ , that is, $M \le a$ for all $a\in A$ ,
- if $m$ is another lower bound for $A$ , then $m\le M$ .
Such a number $M$ is called the infimum of $A$ , and it is denoted by $\inf A$ . Just as we proved that the supremum is unique, one can also show that the infimum is unique. The next lemma shows that the infimum exists.
Lemma 1 Every non-empty set bounded from below has a greatest lower bound.
Proof. Let
 be a lower bound for non-empty set $A$ . In other words, $m\le a$ for all $a\in A$ . Let
Let us recall the following result from this page; if $m$ is an upper(lower) bound for $A$ , then $-m$ is a lower(upper) bound for $-A$ .
Thus $-A$ is bounded from above by $-m$ .
It follows that $-A$ has a least upper bound $\sup (-A)$ . Now $-\sup (-A)$ is a greatest lower bound for $A$ . First, by the result, it is a lower bound for $A$ . Second, if $m$ is a lower bound for $A$ , then $-m$ is a upper bound for $-A$ , and $\sup (-A)\le -m$ , or $m\ge -\sup (-A)$ . 
The proof shows that if $A$ is non-empty and bounded from below, then $$ \inf A = -\sup (-A). $$ In consequence, if $A$ is bounded from above, then $$ \sup A = -\inf (-A). $$
In many respects, the supremum and infimum are similar to the maximum and minimum, or the largest and smallest element in a set. However, it is important to notice that the $\inf A$ and $\sup A$ do not need to belong to $A$ . (See examples below.)
- For example, consider the set of negative real numbers
Then $\sup A = 0$ . Indeed. First, $a < 0$ for all $a \in A$ , and if $a < b$ for all $a \in A$ , then $0 \le b$ .
- The sequence $-(1\!-\!\frac{1}{1}),\,1\!-\!\frac{1}{2},\,-(1\!-\!\frac{1}{3}),\, 1\!-\!\frac{1}{4},\,-(1\!-\!\frac{1}{5}),\,...$ is not convergent. The set $A = \{(-1)^n(1-\frac{1}{n}):\,\, n\in\mathbb{Z}_+\}$ formed by its members has the infimum $-1$ and the supremum 1.
|
Anyone with an account can edit this entry. Please help improve it!
"infimum and supremum for real numbers" is owned by matte. [ full author list (2) ]
|
|
(view preamble | get metadata)
Cross-references: members, convergent, sequence, negative, belong, element, similar, consequence, proof, bound, infimum, lower bound, greatest lower bound, bounded from below, easy to see, supremum, number, upper bound, least upper bound, imply, real numbers, axioms, bounded from above, subset
There are 2 references to this entry.
This is version 3 of infimum and supremum for real numbers, born on 2006-02-19, modified 2006-04-26.
Object id is 7638, canonical name is InfimumAndSupremumForRealNumbers.
Accessed 11187 times total.
Classification:
| AMS MSC: | 12D99 (Field theory and polynomials :: Real and complex fields :: Miscellaneous) | | | 26-00 (Real functions :: General reference works ) | | | 54C30 (General topology :: Maps and general types of spaces defined by maps :: Real-valued functions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pending Errata and Addenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|