PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: High Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] another proof of pigeonhole principle (Proof)

By induction on $n$ . It is harmless to let $n$ = $m + 1$ , since $0$ lacks proper subsets. Suppose that $f : n \to n$ is injective.

To begin, note that $m \in f[n]$ . Otherwise, $f[m] \subseteq m$ , so that by the induction hypothesis, $f[m] = m$ . Then $f[n] = f[m]$ , since $f[n] \subseteq m$ . Therefore, for some $k < m$ , $f(k) = f(m)$ .

Let $g : f[n] \to f[n]$ transpose $m$ and $f(m)$ . Then $h \vert_m : m \to m$ is injective, where $h = g \circ f$ . By the induction hypothesis, $h \vert_m[m] = m$ . Therefore:

$\displaystyle f[n]$ $\displaystyle = g \circ h[n]$    
  $\displaystyle = h[n]$    
  $\displaystyle = m \cup \{m\}$    
  $\displaystyle = m + 1$    
  $\displaystyle = n$   .    




"another proof of pigeonhole principle" is owned by ratboy.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:


This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: transpose, induction hypothesis, injective, proper subsets, induction
There is 1 reference to this entry.

This is version 2 of another proof of pigeonhole principle, born on 2006-06-25, modified 2006-06-25.
Object id is 8086, canonical name is AnotherProofOfPigeonholePrinciple.
Accessed 2574 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC03E05 (Mathematical logic and foundations :: Set theory :: Other combinatorial set theory)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)