PlanetMath (more info)
 Math for the people, by the people. Sponsor PlanetMath
Encyclopedia | Requests | Forums | Docs | Wiki | Random | RSS  
Login
create new user
name:
pass:
forget your password?
Main Menu
Owner confidence rating: Very high Entry average rating: No information on entry rating
[parent] proof that $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$ is quasi-compact (Proof)

Note that most of the notation used here is defined in the entry prime spectrum.

The following is a proof that $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$ is quasi-compact.

Proof. Let $\Lambda$ be an indexing set and $\displaystyle \left\{ U_{\lambda} \right\}_{\lambda \in \Lambda}$ be an open cover for $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$ For every $\lambda \in \Lambda$ let $I_{\lambda}$ be an ideal of $R$ with $\displaystyle U_{\lambda}=\operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus V\left( I_{\lambda} \right)$ Since
$\begin{array}{ll} \operatorname{Spec}(R) & \displaystyle =\bigcup_{\lambda \in \Lambda} U_{\lambda} \\ & \displaystyle =\bigcup_{\lambda \in \Lambda} \bigg( \operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus V\left( I_{\lambda} \right) \bigg) \\ & \displaystyle =\operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus \bigcap_{\lambda \in \Lambda} V\left( I_{\lambda} \right) \\ & \displaystyle =\operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus V\left( \sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda} I_{\lambda} \right), \end{array}$

$\displaystyle V\left( \sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda} I_{\lambda} \right)=\emptyset$ Thus, by this theorem, $\displaystyle \sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda} I_{\lambda} =R$ Since $\displaystyle 1_R \in R=\sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda} I_{\lambda}$ there exists a finite subset $L$ of $\Lambda$ such that, for every $\ell \in L$ there exists an $i_{\ell} \in I_{\ell}$ with $\displaystyle 1_R=\sum_{\ell \in L} i_{\ell}$

Let $r \in R$ Then $\displaystyle r=r \cdot 1_R=r\sum_{\ell \in L} i_{\ell}=\sum_{\ell \in L} r \cdot i_{\ell} \in \sum_{\ell \in L} I_{\ell}$ Thus, $\displaystyle \sum_{\ell \in L} I_{\ell}=R$ Therefore, $\displaystyle V\left( \sum_{\ell \in L} I_{\ell} \right)=\emptyset$ Since

$\begin{array}{ll} \operatorname{Spec}(R) & \displaystyle =\operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus V\left( \sum_{\ell \in L} I_{\ell} \right) \\ & \displaystyle =\operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus \bigcap_{\ell \in L} V\left( I_{\ell} \right) \\ & \displaystyle =\bigcup_{\ell \in L} \bigg( \operatorname{Spec}(R) \setminus V\left( I_{\ell} \right) \bigg) \\ & \displaystyle =\bigcup_{\ell \in L} U_{\ell}, \end{array}$

$\displaystyle \left\{ U_{\lambda} \right\}_{\lambda \in \Lambda}$ restricts to a finite subcover. It follows that $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$ is quasi-compact. $ \qedsymbol$




"proof that $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$ is quasi-compact" is owned by Wkbj79.
(view preamble | get metadata)

View style:

See Also: $V(I)=\emptyset$ implies $I=R$


This object's parent.
Log in to rate this entry.
(view current ratings)

Cross-references: subcover, subset, finite, ideal, open cover, indexing set, quasi-compact, proof, prime spectrum

This is version 7 of proof that $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$ is quasi-compact, born on 2006-07-30, modified 2007-05-30.
Object id is 8198, canonical name is ProofThatOperatornameSpecRIsQuasiCompact.
Accessed 1114 times total.

Classification:
AMS MSC14A15 (Algebraic geometry :: Foundations :: Schemes and morphisms)

Pending Errata and Addenda
None.
[ View all 1 ]
Discussion
Style: Expand: Order:
forum policy

No messages.

Interact
post | correct | update request | add example | add (any)